The trial: SF economist testifies on financial impact of marriage ban

[Note: Article based primarily on courtroom Twitter updates from several sources. See this Twitter list for the full stream.] The Perry v. Schwarzenegger (aka Prop 8) trial turned today from history to economics as the chief economist for San Francisco, Dr Edmund Egan, took the stand. Egan explained his office reviews legislation proposed by the Board of Supervisors to determine if the measure would have a material economic impact on the city and county. Under questioning from plaintiff’s lawyers, Egan testified that the Prop. 8’s ban on same-sex marriages is costing San Francisco millions of dollars a year in lost revenue and increased services,
href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/01/11/state/n080724S48.DTL#ixzz0ccfeUnjP">San Francisco Chronicle reports. He explained that the ban has financial consequences in several areas.

Egan testified that married people generally accumulate more wealth leading to more sales and increased property values, resulting in higher spending and more sales tax and property tax revenue for San Francisco.

He noted that marriages for same-sex couples would probably also decrease the burden on the public health system because more companies would be likely to insure both spouses if a couple is married. It’s a point that Prop. 8 lawyers disputed on one of their Twitter feeds, by noting HRC statistics showing that a majority of Fortune 500 companies now offer equal health benefits to domestic partners. But, just as that tweet from Alliance Defense Fund crossed the feed, Judge Vaughn Walker admitted into evidence a document describing an employer policy that provides health benefits to married same-sex spouses but not to domestic partners.

More...


blog comments powered by Disqus


 Advertisements



Love and Pride Jewelry